There are about 30 cubic feet of cargo space behind the second-row seat, while maximum capacity stands at about 59 cubes. However, rear legroom doesn't measure up to that of chief competitors, notably the Equinox. The available navigation system is less expensive than those in most other cars, but the small display makes certain information hard to see.Īmple hiproom and headroom keep CX-7 passengers comfortable, even with all five seats occupied. Hard plastic surfaces are evident, but the attractive graining makes them less objectionable. Build quality and ergonomics are both very good, although some might find the radio controls a bit complicated compared to other vehicles. A sporty three-spoke steering wheel with audio controls is reminiscent of the one found in the Miata, while the gauge cluster is similar to the RX-8's. The CX-7's athletic styling carries over to the interior of the cabin, where the edgy yet functional design provides a more visually interesting environment than one might expect from a crossover SUV. Along with other top crossovers, the CX-5 is one you'll want to check out. It's worth noting, however, that Mazda will be replacing the CX-7 with the all-new 2013 CX-5, a crossover that keeps much of the 7's personality but with a fully modern design. Vehicles like the Kia Sportage and Volkswagen Tiguan are also fun to drive yet more efficient, while models like the Chevrolet Equinox and Subaru Forester are more versatile and practical. You can make calls and stream music from your smartphone through Bluetooth, but there's no factory-installed USB port.Ĭonsidering all this, we think most small crossover SUV shoppers will do better with one of the newer choices available. Sure, there's a navigation system available, but it has an unusually small screen and quirky interface. The materials used don't really impress, the features certainly need updating and the CX-7 lacks any of the newer SUV's more creative and accommodating seating solutions for the second row. Then there's the 2012 Mazda CX-7's interior which, while quite attractive, is starting to feel a little down-market. However, this comes at the expense of even worse fuel economy - the worst in its class, in fact. Upgrading to the far more powerful turbocharged engine leaves the four-cylinder competition in the dust and provides the CX-7 with the same acceleration as a V6. For these reasons, it's slow and not particularly fuel-efficient. A CX-7 with front-wheel drive weighs about the same as a Honda CR-V with all-wheel drive. The base engine is comparatively underpowered by today's standards, and the CX-7 itself is a little heavy, too. Where the CX-7 finds itself out of date is under the hood. It manages to find that fine line between sport and comfort often missed by others. Despite its road-holding prowess, the ride is quite good as well: controlled but never nervous and by no means numb or vague. Mazda has a reputation for building vehicles with this dynamic edge. Steering and handling are exceptionally good, and its track test numbers still hold up to those of more recently introduced compact SUVs. It's still pretty sporty looking and there's substance behind that sheet metal, as the CX-7 drives quite well. The 2012 Mazda CX-7 continues to have some nice attributes. This makes for fierce competition, which is why the Mazda CX-7, introduced five model years ago, is increasingly outclassed in most respects. By our count, there are close to 30 new vehicles available in this class. In case you hadn't noticed, the small crossover SUV segment is wildly popular.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |